|
Post by veritas on Mar 6, 2019 10:08:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by temple01uk on Apr 8, 2019 19:49:29 GMT
Sounds like Tommy may be getting the push, or she's decided to continue the investigation on her own again, Stana did say the action switches to Europe at some stage.
|
|
|
Post by sydauscaskettfan2412 on Apr 9, 2019 13:24:49 GMT
Sounds like Tommy may be getting the push, or she's decided to continue the investigation on her own again, Stana did say the action switches to Europe at some stage. interesting development......oh dear.
|
|
|
Post by temple01uk on Apr 9, 2019 13:29:22 GMT
I suspect he isn't going to give in easily, plus Stana said the investigation switches to Europe at some point so he would not be able to accompany her without some serious questions from his bosses....but he seems dogged enough to try and stick with her.
|
|
|
Post by sydauscaskettfan2412 on Apr 9, 2019 13:33:38 GMT
I suspect he isn't going to give in easily, plus Stana said the investigation switches to Europe at some point so he would not be able to accompany her without some serious questions from his bosses....but he seems dogged enough to try and stick with her. The actual dialogue/reactions/expressions/scene-s will be most interesting.
|
|
|
Post by goaway on Apr 10, 2019 2:21:06 GMT
Okay. I watched Ep3 and happy to report that without the horrible writer from ep2, this episode's dialogue was much better and got things back on track with ep1 imo. Although I am at the end of my rope with the whole punk and broken thing and the way Stana chose to look and portray it this year; I just really think it could have been done more effectively and it is a distraction to me depending on the scene.I thought she was much better in Season 1, and i dont think my opinion will change now that it's clear how she's going to play it all, including the whispery voice she suddenly assumed that Patrick lost (ha! and he is much improved this year, I think). Anyway, I'm glad Emily is finally back with the FBI so things can move along now hopefully, and I liked her scenes with Tommy (poor Tommy!). Hoping her scenes with Cal will be good. Feel free to ask anything else, but other than episode 1 I liked season 1 much better. Will be curious to see how episodes look/feel once Oded's directed episodes are done (I'm thinking that will be episode 5).
|
|
|
Post by temple01uk on Apr 10, 2019 10:01:57 GMT
Well the story is now moving along after a couple of episodes laying the ground work, Tommy seems to have taken himself out of the equation for the moment in a fit of peek at her rejoining the bureau as I doubt that is what Emily intended, but the sneak peek for episode 4 seems to indicate that he is trying to hang on to his relationship with Emily and of course Nick did not look too pleased when Emily told him she was seeing Tommy. I am not sure what to make of Cal yet, but he seems a pretty straight down the line agent, of course his military experience and experience no doubt with injuries to colleagues back then could mean he is able to deal with Emily's daemons a lot better than many in the bureau. The FBI finally have the ID of the terrorist but in the meantime Emily and new partner Cal are dealing with a separate case of what appears on the surface to be a serial killer whose victims include Valarie, although I suspect the three deaths are linked to Emily and her past. A better episode than 1 & 2 as the story is now unfolding, I am sure we will see Emily go rogue at some point again as she barely seems to be managing day to day.
|
|
|
Post by latte on Apr 10, 2019 11:45:36 GMT
How Emily would pass any medical and psych evaluation to 'rejoin' the FBI is beyond belief from what we have seen of her so far. A simple blood profile would have her ineligible but lets not let RL get in the way of a story. Tommy, as I posted earlier, is simply a tool for Emily and his own demon is his need for her. Sad all round really.
The autopsy was truly beyond reality and again demonstrated how Emily wouldn't ever pass a psych evaluation. Who could put their hand up to attend their own parents autopsy? No, me either.
Poor Jack, he's been doing all the hard work and it seems that there are more challenges ahead. He and Alice look like a good pairing-certainly some genuine empathy there between them.
Alice should give Nick the big heave ho, he is a self absorbed and emotionally stunted person. That last scene where he put himself and his partner in unnecessary risk shows how dysfunctional and probably incompetent he is. As for the so called interrogation of the brotherhood leader, that was laughable by Nick. Seriously, did it take hours for him to be told that the best way of getting to the guy was to create the lie he was cooperating? How did he get to the level of seniority he has in his career? No wonder he couldn't find Emily!
On the point of binge watching. I think if one watched the first three episodes in one go, it may be a better product? But really, the storylines are pretty standard fare and not exactly holding one to the edge of ones seat. Probably the most powerful scene was the autopsy and what a shame Emily was wearing a mask as Stana's facial expressions could have sold the scene even more IMO.
What's clear is there are a lot of characters holding on by the edge and they are all operating on parallel tracks with little connection. Alice and Jack maybe? Emily will do what ever it takes to get what she wants and I mean anything. That makes her a very risky FBI Agent and partner. Sorry Tommy but you've passed your use by date it would seem in Emily's eyes.
It was excellent to see an actual family conference conducted in a more professional manner, albeit with the 'expert behind the desk. Why did the therapist in the young people's session take so long to notice Flynn desperately trying to open a locked door? Why was the door locked in the first place? Again no pointers in the writing to allow us to know how old Flynn actually is now and of course what the time jump was between seasons. But he seemed way too old for that therapy group.
On a lighter note, it seems that Emily's new bow legged walk disappears once she becomes an Agent?
|
|
|
Post by kitkat on Apr 10, 2019 14:01:11 GMT
Well the story is now moving along after a couple of episodes laying the ground work, Tommy seems to have taken himself out of the equation for the moment in a fit of peek at her rejoining the bureau as I doubt that is what Emily intended, but the sneak peek for episode 4 seems to indicate that he is trying to hang on to his relationship with Emily and of course Nick did not look too pleased when Emily told him she was seeing Tommy. I am not sure what to make of Cal yet, but he seems a pretty straight down the line agent, of course his military experience and experience no doubt with injuries to colleagues back then could mean he is able to deal with Emily's daemons a lot better than many in the bureau. The FBI finally have the ID of the terrorist but in the meantime Emily and new partner Cal are dealing with a separate case of what appears on the surface to be a serial killer whose victims include Valarie, although I suspect the three deaths are linked to Emily and her past. A better episode than 1 & 2 as the story is now unfolding, I am sure we will see Emily go rogue at some point again as she barely seems to be managing day to day. Good review again Temple01uk. I like that you keep them light & don't give much away. Some reviews on here are a little over the top. This is just a T.V. show not RL.
|
|
|
Post by sydauscaskettfan2412 on Apr 10, 2019 15:37:03 GMT
Oh my goodness.....Jack is doing his best to either be reinstated or be dismissed entirely.....his actions are foolhardy albeit (trying to be) being heroic in the ambulance, but still. As virtually quickly as she entered the show, the birth mother exited.
Where season 1 was shockable, this is equally so re Emily. Flynn is now entrenched in therapy and this time with kids his own age, and it was interesting to see him in a different light ie getting frustrated/aggravated re a door that wouldnt open, to him punching a fellow therapy kid. When the parents have their session/meeting, it was good of Emily to tell of Flynns personal issue., but admonished because she didnt when it first happened.
Glad to see Emily back searching through the campervan/winnebago for clues. But her rejoining the bureau is (sort of) under false pretences. Its interesting the opposing dynamics re Jack and Emily; he cant yet be a doctor/surgeon, but she gets reinstated in the FBI, And the case that she Requests to work on; her birth mothers death....thats conflict of interest. She dosnt want anyone to know who Valerie is/was, but for all intents and purposes, Valerie is/was her birth mother. (Agent Cal is now partnered with Emily.). Im sort of getting vibes of Castles Kate in DC arc (ie the work clothes), and of Kate privately working on her late mother Johanna Becketts murder. Emily is back working at FBI under/via subterfuge.
The show is progressing much quicker than season 1 did. I did take note that the writer of this eps name was a Logan Slater. ie Logan being the name of Kates 'first' brief 'husband' in Castle ie infamous 6.23.
|
|
|
Post by temple01uk on Apr 10, 2019 15:46:03 GMT
You are right, there is a strong Beckett feel with Emily unable to settle without first solving her case and that of the other orphans at the expense of her personal and professional life. I suspect Cal will be quite a straight player, a little like Ryan and not used to going rogue, Emily may well get jumpy if she cannot set the pace in the investigation. To this end it would make sense to keep her links with Tommy as another arm of her search, and next week we see him trying to keep the relationship alive despite her throwing walls in the way but he seems to be made of strong stuff so may well prevail, all be it on her terms. I cannot help think that something may well develop between Alice and Jack, Nick is way off in this relationship and barely paying attention to Flynn's situation, but we will see.
|
|
|
Post by latte on Apr 10, 2019 23:09:35 GMT
Oh my goodness.....Jack is doing his best to either be reinstated or be dismissed entirely.....his actions are foolhardy albeit (trying to be) being heroic in the ambulance, but still. As virtually quickly as she entered the show, the birth mother exited. Where season 1 was shockable, this is equally so re Emily. Flynn is now entrenched in therapy and this time with kids his own age, and it was interesting to see him in a different light ie getting frustrated/aggravated re a door that wouldnt open, to him punching a fellow therapy kid. When the parents have their session/meeting, it was good of Emily to tell of Flynns personal issue., but admonished because she didnt when it first happened. Glad to see Emily back searching through the campervan/winnebago for clues. But her rejoining the bureau is (sort of) under false pretences. Its interesting the opposing dynamics re Jack and Emily; he cant yet be a doctor/surgeon, but she gets reinstated in the FBI, And the case that she Requests to work on; her birth mothers death....thats conflict of interest. She dosnt want anyone to know who Valerie is/was, but for all intents and purposes, Valerie is/was her birth mother. (Agent Cal is now partnered with Emily.). Im sort of getting vibes of Castles Kate in DC arc (ie the work clothes), and of Kate privately working on her late mother Johanna Becketts murder. Emily is back working at FBI under/via subterfuge. The show is progressing much quicker than season 1 did. I did take note that the writer of this eps name was a Logan Slater. ie Logan being the name of Kates 'first' brief 'husband' in Castle ie infamous 6.23. Good point on Jack working diligently to tick all the boxes in his life to try and get back to work as a surgeon and yet still frustratingly coming up short. Yet Emily, seems to get a free pass on any of her clearly dysfunctional and risky behaviour to be employed by the FBI again? But hey, the guy from the FBI who gave her the job and her pick of any case she wanted, is sleeping with a reporter on the side! Not too sure about Cal's compatibility with Emily yet, we really haven't seen that much of him to get a good read.
|
|
|
Post by latte on Apr 10, 2019 23:16:56 GMT
Well the story is now moving along after a couple of episodes laying the ground work, Tommy seems to have taken himself out of the equation for the moment in a fit of peek at her rejoining the bureau as I doubt that is what Emily intended, but the sneak peek for episode 4 seems to indicate that he is trying to hang on to his relationship with Emily and of course Nick did not look too pleased when Emily told him she was seeing Tommy. I am not sure what to make of Cal yet, but he seems a pretty straight down the line agent, of course his military experience and experience no doubt with injuries to colleagues back then could mean he is able to deal with Emily's daemons a lot better than many in the bureau. The FBI finally have the ID of the terrorist but in the meantime Emily and new partner Cal are dealing with a separate case of what appears on the surface to be a serial killer whose victims include Valarie, although I suspect the three deaths are linked to Emily and her past. A better episode than 1 & 2 as the story is now unfolding, I am sure we will see Emily go rogue at some point again as she barely seems to be managing day to day. Good review again Temple01uk. I like that you keep them light & don't give much away. Some reviews on here are a little over the top. This is just a T.V. show not RL. And there you go again with the put downs. There's only four members taking the time to share their thoughts here which is great but also a little sad that more members don't give it a go. It's a spoiler thread-very clearly marked. Reviewers are going to comment, with spoilers as they wish, and not to cater for the needs of those who don't want to read any. Yet, you still find a way to snipe about another members thoughts, over something you haven't even seen? The more authentic the storytelling the less one can drift away. Of course we all appreciate that there are some occasions when its a silly reflection on RL, but if the set up and the acting is first class then we go with it-hence our love for Castle.
|
|
|
Post by goaway on Apr 11, 2019 4:42:31 GMT
Good review again Temple01uk. I like that you keep them light & don't give much away. Some reviews on here are a little over the top. This is just a T.V. show not RL. And there you go again with the put downs. There's only four members taking the time to share their thoughts here which is great but also a little sad that more members don't give it a go. It's a spoiler thread-very clearly marked. Reviewers are going to comment, with spoilers as they wish, and not to cater for the needs of those who don't want to read any. Yet, you still find a way to snipe about another members thoughts, over something you haven't even seen? The more authentic the storytelling the less one can drift away. Of course we all appreciate that there are some occasions when its a silly reflection on RL, but if the set up and the acting is first class then we go with it-hence our love for Castle. ^ Agree with you, Latte! I choose to ignore those who snipe personally at others, but it's good when others show you who they are I suppose so I know who to ignore! As for your comments above on the episode, I was laughing out loud at the bow-legged comment. Too true! Forgot to say that I did like the way Stana acted all peppy at the FBI in order to get her job back. That was amusing. By the way, are there any critic/magazine/newspaper reviews out there yet about these new episodes I wonder? Will be curious to see how this season is seen compared to season 1.
|
|
|
Post by latte on Apr 11, 2019 5:17:23 GMT
And there you go again with the put downs. There's only four members taking the time to share their thoughts here which is great but also a little sad that more members don't give it a go. It's a spoiler thread-very clearly marked. Reviewers are going to comment, with spoilers as they wish, and not to cater for the needs of those who don't want to read any. Yet, you still find a way to snipe about another members thoughts, over something you haven't even seen? The more authentic the storytelling the less one can drift away. Of course we all appreciate that there are some occasions when its a silly reflection on RL, but if the set up and the acting is first class then we go with it-hence our love for Castle. ^ Agree with you, Latte! I choose to ignore those who snipe personally at others, but it's good when others show you who they are I suppose so I know who to ignore! As for your comments above on the episode, I was laughing out loud at the bow-legged comment. Too true! Forgot to say that I did like the way Stana acted all peppy at the FBI in order to get her job back. That was amusing. By the way, are there any critic/magazine/newspaper reviews out there yet about these new episodes I wonder? Will be curious to see how this season is seen compared to season 1. What I liked with her little FBI 'peppy' act is that they finally spent some real camera time on Stana's face rather than use dialogue. I've always thought Stana knocks it out of the acting park when she doesn't over act the dramatic stuff and when she uses her wonderful facial range to 'tell' us what she's thinking. I can't even find descriptions for the episodes and the usual production credits let alone a professional review. Not counting fan reviews or the likes of click bait sites who post whatever will bring fans to the site. Perhaps someone here knows credible sites with reviews? TBH, as Stana fans, we watch what she's producing no matter what. But I don't think Absentia really is setting any entertainment world on fire-it's a useful program option with an enthusiastic but small fan base is how I see it.
|
|
|
Post by sydauscaskettfan2412 on Apr 11, 2019 14:15:31 GMT
Oh my goodness.....Jack is doing his best to either be reinstated or be dismissed entirely.....his actions are foolhardy albeit (trying to be) being heroic in the ambulance, but still. As virtually quickly as she entered the show, the birth mother exited. Where season 1 was shockable, this is equally so re Emily. Flynn is now entrenched in therapy and this time with kids his own age, and it was interesting to see him in a different light ie getting frustrated/aggravated re a door that wouldnt open, to him punching a fellow therapy kid. When the parents have their session/meeting, it was good of Emily to tell of Flynns personal issue., but admonished because she didnt when it first happened. Glad to see Emily back searching through the campervan/winnebago for clues. But her rejoining the bureau is (sort of) under false pretences. Its interesting the opposing dynamics re Jack and Emily; he cant yet be a doctor/surgeon, but she gets reinstated in the FBI, And the case that she Requests to work on; her birth mothers death....thats conflict of interest. She dosnt want anyone to know who Valerie is/was, but for all intents and purposes, Valerie is/was her birth mother. (Agent Cal is now partnered with Emily.). Im sort of getting vibes of Castles Kate in DC arc (ie the work clothes), and of Kate privately working on her late mother Johanna Becketts murder. Emily is back working at FBI under/via subterfuge. The show is progressing much quicker than season 1 did. I did take note that the writer of this eps name was a Logan Slater. ie Logan being the name of Kates 'first' brief 'husband' in Castle ie infamous 6.23. Good point on Jack working diligently to tick all the boxes in his life to try and get back to work as a surgeon and yet still frustratingly coming up short. Yet Emily, seems to get a free pass on any of her clearly dysfunctional and risky behaviour to be employed by the FBI again? But hey, the guy from the FBI who gave her the job and her pick of any case she wanted, is sleeping with a reporter on the side! Not too sure about Cal's compatibility with Emily yet, we really haven't seen that much of him to get a good read. Yes it did seem strange for Emily to just 'walk in' and get reinstated in the FBI Bureau without having a proper evaluation for her readiness, and especially as she is drinking and taking drugs, but she is already having issues re her arrival in the main work area....... It seemed odd for her to be able to request what case to work on, rather than being told what case to work on.... I also am unsure about Cal. What isnt helping is that Ive not seen him in any other roles here either.
|
|
|
Post by lurker on Apr 18, 2019 14:28:58 GMT
Watched Madness. After Nick's answer to Emily's question what's going on in the investigation in the poisoning case "I can't talk about the ongoing investigation" it was clear that Emily will go back to the FBI. In E01 Nick said to some colleague that Emily was still trying to find her footings. So, no one in the FBI knows about the drinking and occasional drugs. Chief Crown maybe feels that FBI owes her a little after man hunting her and wrongly accusing her of being a multiple murderer. So, real life aside, that's mine explanation. Also, Emily can play nice if it suits her and play the right cards, i.e. she can lie when needed. Do you want the kidnapping case? Of course not. That made me smile.
Does she have any obligation of reporting to Nick that she's back to the Bureau, or that she's seeing Tommy? No. He's the one who got remarried and has another life. You can be rational about it but it still stings. If he still feels guilty for abandoning the search for Emily to soon, that's his problem not Emily's. By the way Nick and the profiler are working quite nicely together. Wait till Alice finds out. To me it is clear that Nick before Emily's disappearance and after it are to different persons. Damaged for good. That's what I'm getting from Alice's reactions. So is Emily.
We don't know exactly what was Emily like at work before the kidnapping. Was she always all strung up, was she liked among colleagues? "The Emily we knew doesn't exist anymore", said Radford in S01. Right know she's barely holding up hoping that putting a blazer on is enough of a veneer for public. And to top it all she finds that her whole life was a lie in some way. Veronica's autopsy scene was good. The mask was necessary because the ME saw her with Tommy. Stana played it good. Watch Emily's throat, breathing and the body language when the ME starts to cut. Enough signals that Cal picked up that something is wrong. Conflict of interest? Yes, but no one knows who or what Veronica is to Emily. Let's hope that Emily erased her traces from that van, and that Flynn will keep his mouth shut. She is a walking time bomb, and all the rage and aggression from S01 are still there inside. Also she was never "by the book agent" even before kidnapping, so, yes, going rogue is expected at some point. Nick was a fan of rules not Emily.
Tommy is frustrated with Emily and her rules.
Flynn's life is messed up. Maybe I'm wrong but wait till the full locked aggression starts. Alice is finally bored up with being a housewife. So, Alice at work, Nick at work, they've lost the baby, their son in therapy. At the moment a nice dysfunctional family to burst or to reinstate itself at the end.
Jack is frustrated with working at ER.
Anyone happy here? No, but that's Absentia. Not Castle at all and that's good.
|
|
|
Post by sydauscaskettfan2412 on Apr 18, 2019 14:45:11 GMT
Watched Madness. After Nick's answer to Emily's question what's going on in the investigation in the poisoning case "I can't talk about the ongoing investigation" it was clear that Emily will go back to the FBI. In E01 Nick said to some colleague that Emily was still trying to find her footings. So, no one in the FBI knows about the drinking and occasional drugs. Chief Crown maybe feels that FBI owes her a little after man hunting her and wrongly accusing her of being a multiple murderer. So, real life aside, that's mine explanation. Also, Emily can play nice if it suits her and play the right cards, i.e. she can lie when needed. Do you want the kidnapping case? Of course not. That made me smile.
Does she have any obligation of reporting to Nick that she's back to the Bureau, or that she's seeing Tommy? No. He's the one who got remarried and has another life. You can be rational about it but it still stings. If he still feels guilty for abandoning the search for Emily to soon, that's his problem not Emily's. By the way Nick and the profiler are working quite nicely together. Wait till Alice finds out. To me it is clear that Nick before Emily's disappearance and after it are to different persons. Damaged for good. That's what I'm getting from Alice's reactions. So is Emily.
We don't know exactly what was Emily like at work before the kidnapping. Was she always all strung up, was she liked among colleagues? "The Emily we knew doesn't exist anymore", said Radford in S01. Right know she's barely holding up hoping that putting a blazer on is enough of a veneer for public. And to top it all she finds that her whole life was a lie in some way. Veronica's autopsy scene was good. The mask was necessary because the ME saw her with Tommy. Stana played it good. Watch Emily's throat, breathing and the body language when the ME starts to cut. Enough signals that Cal picked up that something is wrong. Conflict of interest? Yes, but no one knows who or what Veronica is to Emily. Let's hope that Emily erased her traces from that van, and that Flynn will keep his mouth shut. She is a walking time bomb, and all the rage and aggression from S01 are still there inside. Also she was never "by the book agent" even before kidnapping, so, yes, going rogue is expected at some point. Nick was a fan of rules not Emily.
Tommy is frustrated with Emily and her rules.
Flynn's life is messed up. Maybe I'm wrong but wait till the full locked aggression starts. Alice is finally bored up with being a housewife. So, Alice at work, Nick at work, they've lost the baby, their son in therapy. At the moment a nice dysfunctional family to burst or to reinstate itself at the end.
Jack is frustrated with working at ER.
Anyone happy here? No, but that's Absentia. Not Castle at all and that's good.
Brilliant brilliant brilliant!!! I also like your point that the FBI feels that they owe Emily from Season 1 when she was forced on the run after being found after being kidnapped and tortured. Its a very good point and could explain why they decided to rehire her (still without a seen psych evaluation. But Emily was till determined to work at the FBI so she could work on her now dead mother's Valerie's murder case. Also agree that Emily is a walking time bomb. It will also be interesting to see what eventuates with Alice and Jack.....whether its merely friendship or not. I will add that I sure hope that Nick becomes more aware of son Flynn and why he's in therapy and whats been happening, as time progresses.
|
|
|
Post by jnorton45 on Apr 18, 2019 15:53:53 GMT
^^^ Well nuts. I liked Valerie. The part was very well written and the actress who played Valerie did a superior job. She would have made a great reoccurring character in the show. The actress and the part were exactly what Stana needs to play Emily against - a strong woman foil. Maybe someone else will pick up that slack.
|
|
|
Post by sydauscaskettfan2412 on Apr 18, 2019 16:23:07 GMT
^^^ Well nuts. I liked Valerie. The part was very well written and the actress who played Valerie did a superior job. She would have made a great reoccurring character in the show. The actress and the part were exactly what Stana needs to play Emily against - a strong woman foil. Maybe someone else will pick up that slack. How about the Profiler? ie to be the next strong woman foil for Emily? ie another version of Castles Captain Gates.....who didnt like Rick, but liked Kate as she reminded Gates of herself and Kate made Detective 6 weeks before Gates did. In Absentia 2, the new Profiler seems to fit the bill as in being a strong female character/foil for Kate/Stana to work with., unless it does became a case of working against.....im merely thinking ahead of possible outcomes/plots. Totally agree that the actress playing Valerie, ie Aussie Penny Downie, did a superb job. I also am disappointed that Valerie died too early. It would have been great for her to tell Emily more about Emilys background. Emily could have been placed in the orphanage as a young child/toddler, as Valerie had the old toy rabbit in her things, which I assumed was meant to help Emily remember her background/childhood via a treasured toy.
|
|
|
Post by jnorton45 on Apr 18, 2019 16:33:25 GMT
^^^ Have to leave it up the writers, but I thought Val would be great character to pop up occasionally to throw sand in the gears with her paranoid and true observations. She'd have been a great source of twists and knots.
Thanks for the name of the actress - Penny Downie. She even had Stana's nose. May she can comeback as Val's twin, Emily's equally paranoid aunt.
|
|
|
Post by jnorton45 on Jun 14, 2019 16:11:15 GMT
This just gets better and better. As always Katic does more with a look and a gesture than anyone else does with a line. Each character gets deeper and broader as the story goes along. The actors are running with the improved writing in every case. Tommy is wonderful. The actor who is Emily's birth mother's partner is excellent. Valerie's supplier is super. Stana continues to be consistently great. (What she does with just her eyes at Valarie's autopsy is amazing.) All the other work is much better than s1.
Dark and outstanding.
Really, really like what they are doing here. Writing, acting, directing just get better and better across the board. (Angel Bonanni has turned into a very good actor. Bright future. Break-up scene is super.) The terrorist's parents were very good. Having better work around Stana makes her work look better. Standout work among mediocre work drags on the best work. They have fixed that since s1.
|
|